Case Studies

Adscend Media LLC v. DoGood Media LLC et al,, No. 3:18-cv-00141 (D. Conn.) obtained favorable settlement for Internet marketing company in federal court case involving competitor allegations of defamation, tortious interference and unfair trade practices. The allegations stemmed from a YouTube video that was purportedly forwarded to plaintiff’s business partners.

When a patent troll continued to bully the affiliate marketing industry, network after network decided to settle because doing so was less costly than litigation.  So, when our client, one of the leading digital advertising exchange networks in the world, found itself in the crosshairs of one of the many coercive ecommerce traffic patent infringement lawsuits filed by the plaintiff, Hinch Newman sent a loud and clear message that the plaintiff had targeted the wrong company.

When a tech entrepreneur is faced with an aggressive government inquiry, the time it takes to resolve the matter is, literally, money.  So, when the firm’s client, an industry leading online education business in New York City, received an expansive civil investigative demand (CID) from the Federal Trade Commission inquiring into whether advertising claims relating to education products or services were adequately substantiated, Hinch Newman aggressively advocated on its behalf via persuasive briefing and supporting evidence.